Skip to main content

HOLD ON A DAMN SECOND!

That's it I've had ENOUGH! I repeat, I'VE HAD ENOUGH! It's all well and good for people to go around with different values, some of which are discriminatory. I can deal with these people usually. They're misguided, yet at least they have a logical reason for their views. I ask you this: WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH MITT ROMNEY? So his latest plan to solidify himself a political base is to support a referendum to allow religious organizations to discriminate against homosexual couples. Now I understand why people are against homosexuality, believe me I've heard all the excuses, but for the life of me I cannot understand why we now want to discriminate against our children as well. If homosexual couples are not allowed to adopt children, we will lose out on the largest demographic of people that adopt at all.

WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOU? CAN'T YOU ASSHOLES REALIZE THAT THERE ARE MORE IMPORTANT THINGS THAN YOUR BELIEFS!

I guarantee that there isn't ONE child that would be better off in the custody of the state than in a family of their own. This isn't about YOU! This is about CHILDREN! How dare you think that you have their best interests at heart. HOW DARE YOU PRESUME TO UNDERSTAND THE INNER WORKINGS OF THE MINDS OF OUR YOUNG CHILDREN. Children do not care. Family is no less effective with two mothers or two fathers any more than it is with one of each or only one or the other! Would you rather them wander the streets? Would you rather them live in a home where they are only one of twenty or more children cared for by the state? How effective is that family unit?

Here, I'll tell you what, send me all those who believe that homosexual couples shouldn't adopt and I'll straighten them out for you. I'll straighten them out real good.

This is the life of a child we are talking about, not politics, not running for president, not your agenda, CHILDREN. You have no right to mess with the wellbeing of our children. And that, quite simply, is the final word.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reagan, Deregulation, and the Fruit It Now Bears

President Reagan had an idea about how the world should run. He deregulated Big Business. That is, he removed the restrictions put in place that kept companies from cheating. He removed, primarily economic oversight. He said that it was unAmerican that in this capitalist society that such oversight, such restrictions should exist. To him, these concepts flew in the face of that illusive, figmentary idea we like to call freedom. He wanted Big Business to have the freedom to do what it will and believed that in doing so, said companies would check themselves. They would check themselves because it was in their best economic interest to do so. Yet, what he didn't realize is that what was in the best interest of Corporate America could be unknown to Corporate America itself! That Big Business could be akin to a compulsive gambler who as they fall further and further into the hole panic and begin making riskier and riskier bets, thus then subjecting themselves to even more debt ...
2 comments
Read more

My Last

 My previous post was found as a blank page in draft form this evening.  I found the existence of it to be rather poetic.  So I published it blank as is over a year later.  Seems fitting to be honest.
Post a Comment
Read more

There's a Reason Why There Are No Good Politicians

That is to say there is a reason why there are no politicians with genuine interests at heart. Genuine interests can be defined as points of view on which you are inflexible to opposition. For instance, you are either for human rights or you're not for human rights. You don't have to be AGAINST human rights necessarily to not be for them. Politicians are not political activists. A political activist's interest is the success of a point of view. A politician's is not. There comes a point where a political activist, which I believe all worthwhile politicians begin as, cease to be an activist for an issue and begin to be a politician whose focus is politicking. There are of course politicians from different lines of work, particularly corporate America, but that plague is best left for discussion at a different time. The crux of the difference between an activist and a politician is flexibility. Activists are inflexible on their positions. Politicians are born o...
Post a Comment
Read more