Skip to main content

The Reason Why God Cannot Exist

This is the reason why God cannot exist....


Question: Can God heat up a burrito so hot that even he cannot bear to eat it?



That's all, that's the answer to whether or not God can exist. The answer is no.
Labels:

Comments

Rob said…
ah The Simpsons...but you should probably note this a pop-culture reference and not an original philosophical argument.



Possible (imperfect) responses:

+God doesn't necessarily need to be Omnipotent...that is just a Western conception
+God isn't anthropomorphic so this question doesn't apply
+God could lift a boulder that is too heavy to lift (or eat a buritto that is too hot to eat) by making it not as heavy...
9:38 PM
FlyFreeForever said…
Oh, let's see... yes that's where it came from. You'd be surprized what they come up with.

The point of the question was to explain that absolutes rarely if ever exist. Absolute power, absolute knowledge, or in my opinion absolute deity.

And whose to say if one god or another does exist whether or not he/she/it is anthropomorphic. I'm sure if most gods we worship (by doctrine alone) have some capability to take human form.

And yes he could cool the burrito off, but that distracts from the argument made by the question. That there cannot be an all-powerful, omnipotent overlord, there are just simply too many impossible absolutes created.

But, if that argument isn't suitable let's give a second...

If God is the Creator then he is like our father. He is also the creator of concepts like good and just and thereby has the capibility to be completely good and just himself. Then we are given free will, as I would think God himself would have too. Why then did God create Satan? He would've known already that Satan would betray him. But more so, how could Satan betray him if there was no force in existance to tempt him to betray God? I'm quite sure that that Bible believes that Satan did this of his own accord. But it seems to me impossible.
11:00 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reagan, Deregulation, and the Fruit It Now Bears

President Reagan had an idea about how the world should run. He deregulated Big Business. That is, he removed the restrictions put in place that kept companies from cheating. He removed, primarily economic oversight. He said that it was unAmerican that in this capitalist society that such oversight, such restrictions should exist. To him, these concepts flew in the face of that illusive, figmentary idea we like to call freedom. He wanted Big Business to have the freedom to do what it will and believed that in doing so, said companies would check themselves. They would check themselves because it was in their best economic interest to do so. Yet, what he didn't realize is that what was in the best interest of Corporate America could be unknown to Corporate America itself! That Big Business could be akin to a compulsive gambler who as they fall further and further into the hole panic and begin making riskier and riskier bets, thus then subjecting themselves to even more debt ...
2 comments
Read more

My Last

 My previous post was found as a blank page in draft form this evening.  I found the existence of it to be rather poetic.  So I published it blank as is over a year later.  Seems fitting to be honest.
Post a Comment
Read more

There's a Reason Why There Are No Good Politicians

That is to say there is a reason why there are no politicians with genuine interests at heart. Genuine interests can be defined as points of view on which you are inflexible to opposition. For instance, you are either for human rights or you're not for human rights. You don't have to be AGAINST human rights necessarily to not be for them. Politicians are not political activists. A political activist's interest is the success of a point of view. A politician's is not. There comes a point where a political activist, which I believe all worthwhile politicians begin as, cease to be an activist for an issue and begin to be a politician whose focus is politicking. There are of course politicians from different lines of work, particularly corporate America, but that plague is best left for discussion at a different time. The crux of the difference between an activist and a politician is flexibility. Activists are inflexible on their positions. Politicians are born o...
Post a Comment
Read more